Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.854
Filter
1.
World J Gastroenterol ; 30(16): 2179-2183, 2024 Apr 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38690018

ABSTRACT

In this editorial we comment on the article published in the recent issue of the World journal of Gastroenterology. We focus specifically on the mechanisms un-derlying the effects of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), the factors which affect the outcomes of FMT in IBS patients, and challenges. FMT has emerged as a efficacious intervention for clostridium difficile infection and holds promise as a therapeutic modality for IBS. The utilization of FMT in the treatment of IBS has undergone scrutiny in numerous randomized controlled trials, yielding divergent outcomes. The current frontier in this field seeks to elucidate these variations, underscore the existing knowledge gaps that necessitate exploration, and provide a guideline for successful FMT imple-mentation in IBS patients. At the same time, the application of FMT as a treatment for IBS confronts several challenges.


Subject(s)
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Irritable Bowel Syndrome , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/therapy , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/microbiology , Fecal Microbiota Transplantation/methods , Humans , Treatment Outcome , Feces/microbiology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Clostridioides difficile/pathogenicity , Clostridium Infections/therapy , Clostridium Infections/microbiology
2.
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 9(6): 507-520, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38643782

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dietary advice and medical treatments are recommended to patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Studies have not yet compared the efficacy of dietary treatment with pharmacological treatment targeting the predominant IBS symptom. We therefore aimed to compare the effects of two restrictive dietary treatment options versus optimised medical treatment in people with IBS. METHODS: This single-centre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial was conducted in a specialised outpatient clinic at the Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. Participants (aged ≥18 years) with moderate-to-severe IBS (Rome IV; IBS Severity Scoring System [IBS-SSS] ≥175) and no other serious diseases or food allergies were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by web-based randomisation to receive a diet low in fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAPs) plus traditional IBS dietary advice recommended by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (hereafter the LFTD diet), a fibre-optimised diet low in total carbohydrates and high in protein and fat (hereafter the low-carbohydrate diet), or optimised medical treatment based on predominant IBS symptom. Participants were masked to the names of the diets, but the pharmacological treatment was open-label. The intervention lasted 4 weeks, after which time participants in the dietary interventions were unmasked to their diets and encouraged to continue during 6 months' follow-up, participants in the LFTD group were instructed on how to reintroduce FODMAPs, and participants receiving pharmacological treatment were offered diet counselling and to continue with their medication. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants who responded to the 4-week intervention, defined as a reduction of 50 or more in IBS-SSS relative to baseline, and was analysed per modified intention-to-treat (ie, all participants who started the intervention). Safety was analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02970591, and is complete. FINDINGS: Between Jan 24, 2017, and Sept 2, 2021, 1104 participants were assessed for eligibility and 304 were randomly assigned. Ten participants did not receive their intervention after randomisation and thus 294 participants were included in the modified intention-to-treat population (96 assigned to the LFTD diet, 97 to the low-carbohydrate diet, and 101 to optimised medical treatment). 241 (82%) of 294 participants were women and 53 (18%) were men and the mean age was 38 (SD 13). After 4 weeks, 73 (76%) of 96 participants in the LFTD diet group, 69 (71%) of 97 participants in the low-carbohydrate diet group, and 59 (58%) of 101 participants in the optimised medical treatment group had a reduction of 50 or more in IBS-SSS compared with baseline, with a significant difference between the groups (p=0·023). 91 (95%) of 96 participants completed 4 weeks in the LFTD group, 92 (95%) of 97 completed 4 weeks in the low-carbohydrate group, and 91 (90%) of 101 completed 4 weeks in the optimised medical treatment group. Two individuals in each of the intervention groups stated that adverse events were the reason for discontinuing the 4-week intervention. Five (5%) of 91 participants in the optimised medical treatment group stopped treatment prematurely due to side-effects. No serious adverse events or treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION: Two 4-week dietary interventions and optimised medical treatment reduced the severity of IBS symptoms, with a larger effect size in the diet groups. Dietary interventions might be considered as an initial treatment for patients with IBS. Research is needed to enable personalised treatment strategies. FUNDING: The Healthcare Board Region Västra Götaland, the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, AFA Insurance, grants from the Swedish state, the Wilhelm and Martina Lundgren Science Foundation, Skandia, the Dietary Science Foundation, and the Nanna Swartz Foundation.


Subject(s)
Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted , Disaccharides , Irritable Bowel Syndrome , Monosaccharides , Oligosaccharides , Humans , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diet therapy , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/therapy , Female , Male , Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted/methods , Single-Blind Method , Adult , Middle Aged , Oligosaccharides/administration & dosage , Disaccharides/adverse effects , Disaccharides/therapeutic use , Monosaccharides/adverse effects , Monosaccharides/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome , Dietary Fiber/administration & dosage , Dietary Fiber/therapeutic use , Polymers , Fermentation , Sweden , Severity of Illness Index , FODMAP Diet
3.
Gut Microbes ; 16(1): 2338322, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38630015

ABSTRACT

To determine the efficacy of the probiotic Bifidobacterium longum CECT 7347 (ES1) and postbiotic heat-treated Bifidobacterium longum CECT 7347 (HT-ES1) in improving symptom severity in adults with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D), a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with 200 participants split into three groups was carried out. Two capsules of either ES1, HT-ES1 or placebo were administered orally, once daily, for 84 days (12 weeks). The primary outcome was change in total IBS-Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS) score from baseline, compared to placebo. Secondary outcome measures were stool consistency, quality of life, abdominal pain severity and anxiety scores. Safety parameters and adverse events were also monitored. The change in IBS-SSS scores from baseline compared to placebo, reached significance in the ES1 and HT-ES1 group, on Days 28, 56 and 84. The decrease in mean IBS-SSS score from baseline to Day 84 was: ES1 (-173.70 [±75.60]) vs placebo (-60.44 [±65.5]) (p < .0001) and HT-ES1 (-177.60 [±79.32]) vs placebo (-60.44 [±65.5]) (p < .0001). Secondary outcomes included changes in IBS-QoL, APS-NRS, stool consistency and STAI-S and STAI-T scores, with changes from baseline to Day 84 being significant in ES1 and HT-ES1 groups, compared to the placebo group. Both ES1 and HT-ES1 were effective in reducing IBS-D symptom severity, as evaluated by measures such as IBS-SSS, IBS-QoL, APS-NRS, stool consistency, and STAI, in comparison to the placebo. These results are both statistically significant and clinically meaningful, representing, to the best of the authors' knowledge, the first positive results observed for either a probiotic or postbiotic from the same strain, in this particular population.


What is already known on this topicIBS is a chronic functional gastrointestinal disorder characterized by abdominal pain, bloating and abnormalities in stool frequency or form. The gut microbiota of people living with IBS differs markedly to the microbiota of healthy individuals. Gut microbiota may play a key role in IBS aetiology and IBS symptoms may be alleviated by modulating the gut microbiota. Several proposed ways to modulate gut health include normalizing the gut microbiota, preventing the overgrowth of pathogenic bacteria, modulating visceral afferent pathways, and enhancing intestinal barrier function. However, significant heterogeneity between studies, study quality and population, study design and concerns about sample size have limited national and supranational bodies from recommending probiotics for IBS. Further well-powered, randomized, repeatable and controlled trials are warranted.What this study addsThe results of this study substantially contribute to the IBS research field, firstly by providing clinically meaningful and statistically significant results from a rigorous, well designed randomized, placebo-controlled trial and secondly, by exploring the use of postbiotics in IBS, an area of research still in its infancy. Probiotic (ES1) and postbiotic (HT-ES1) supplementation significantly reduced IBS symptom severity scores compared to placebo. This study met primary and secondary outcomes and strongly suggest that ES1 and HT-ES1 could be beneficial in the management of IBS.How this study might affect research, practice, or policyThis study adds to the current evidence base, supporting the use of probiotic/postbiotics for IBS. This research could be used to inform health professionals about using probiotics in IBS and help improve the quality of life and wellbeing for people living with the condition.


Subject(s)
Bifidobacterium longum , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Irritable Bowel Syndrome , Peptides, Cyclic , Adult , Humans , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/therapy , Quality of Life , Hot Temperature , Diarrhea
4.
Gastroenterol Nurs ; 47(2): 85-91, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38567851

ABSTRACT

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a condition that affects approximately one in 10 people in the United States (Defrees & Bailey, 2017). Despite the high prevalence of IBS, the medical community struggles to effectively understand, diagnose, and treat this disorder (Ankersen et al., 2021). In recent years, an increasing number of health-tech companies have emerged to offer integrated treatment of IBS via telemedicine. This pilot study explores the patient experience of virtual, multidisciplinary IBS care through a U.S.-based company, Oshi Health. Semistructured interviews were conducted followed by thematic analysis to identify commonalities between patient experience and perspective (Van Manen, 2014). Overarching themes were identified as follows: loss of the grocer, a broken system, and the power of self-trust. Although several limitations exist, including small sample size, the study offers insight into the experience of telemedicine services for IBS and provides a framework for future research.


Subject(s)
Irritable Bowel Syndrome , Humans , United States , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diagnosis , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/therapy , Pilot Projects , Qualitative Research
5.
FP Essent ; 539: 23-34, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38648172

ABSTRACT

Dietary modifications can help to prevent and manage many chronic diseases. The Mediterranean and Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diets emphasize consumption of fruits and vegetables while reducing intake of red meat. These diets are supported by well-established evidence for patients with cardiovascular disease and hypertension, respectively. Whole-food, plant-based diets have been shown to result in reduced body weight, lower A1c levels, and decreased insulin resistance in patients with diabetes. Patients with diabetes and hypertension should adhere to a heart-healthy diet, such as the DASH diet. For patients with diabetes and at risk of diabetes, key nutritional recommendations include emphasizing intake of nonstarchy vegetables, minimizing intake of added sugars and refined grains, and choosing whole foods instead of processed foods. The Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020-2025 recommend that adults limit sodium intake to less than 2,300 mg/day. Patients with chronic kidney or liver disease should follow sodium restriction and protein intake guidelines. Patients with irritable bowel syndrome should follow a low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAP) diet with fiber supplementation. For patients with gastrointestinal symptoms, fiber can effectively manage constipation and stool irregularity. Probiotic supplements or foods can be useful for digestive problems.


Subject(s)
Dietary Approaches To Stop Hypertension , Humans , Chronic Disease , Dietary Fiber , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diet therapy , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/therapy , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/diet therapy , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Hypertension/therapy , Hypertension/diet therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/diet therapy , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Diet, Mediterranean , Constipation/diet therapy , Constipation/therapy , Constipation/prevention & control , Liver Diseases/diet therapy , Liver Diseases/therapy , Probiotics/therapeutic use
6.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 9478, 2024 04 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38658619

ABSTRACT

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is frequently linked with coexisting mental illnesses. Our previous study discovered that 32.1% of IBS patients had subthreshold depression (SD), placing them at higher risk of developing major depression. Gut microbiota modulation through psychobiotics was found to influence depression via the gut-brain axis. However, the efficacy of lessening depression among IBS patients remains ambiguous. The study's aim was to investigate the roles of cultured milk drinks containing 109 cfu Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 and Lactobacillus paracasei L. CASEI-01 on depression and related variables among IBS participants with SD. A total of 110 IBS participants with normal mood (NM) and SD, were randomly assigned to one of four intervention groups: IBS-NM with placebo, IBS-NM with probiotic, IBS-SD with placebo, and IBS-SD with probiotic. Each participant was required to consume two bottles of cultured milk every day for a duration of 12 weeks. The following outcomes were assessed: depression risk, quality of life, the severity of IBS, and hormonal changes. The depression scores were significantly reduced in IBS-SD with probiotic and placebo from baseline (p < 0.001). Only IBS-SD with probiotic showed a significant rise in serotonin serum levels (p < 0.05). A significantly higher life quality measures were seen in IBS-SD with probiotic, IBS-SD with placebo, and IBS-NM with placebo (p < 0.05). All groups, both placebo and probiotic, reported significant improvement in IBS severity post-intervention with a higher prevalence of remission and mild IBS (p < 0.05). Dual strains lactobacillus-containing cultured milk drink via its regulation of relevant biomarkers, is a potential anti-depressive prophylactic agent for IBS patients at risk.


Subject(s)
Depression , Irritable Bowel Syndrome , Probiotics , Humans , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/microbiology , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/therapy , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/psychology , Female , Male , Adult , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Probiotics/administration & dosage , Double-Blind Method , Depression/therapy , Depression/microbiology , Middle Aged , Cultured Milk Products/microbiology , Quality of Life , Animals , Milk , Lactobacillus acidophilus/physiology , Lactobacillus , Treatment Outcome , Lacticaseibacillus paracasei
7.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(17): e37982, 2024 Apr 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38669363

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Currently, a variety of Western medical interventions are available for the treatment of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) with comorbid anxiety and depression. However, the attendant negative effects also emerge, putting pressure on healthcare resources and socio-economic structures. In recent years, the benefits of acupuncture (ACU) and moxibustion in the treatment of IBS-D with anxiety and depression have gradually emerged. However, there are many types of ACU-moxibustion-related treatments, and the aim of this study is to examine the effectiveness of different ACU-moxibustion therapies in the treatment of anxiety and depression in IBS-D patients. METHODS: Searched and identified randomized controlled trials (RCTS) of ACU for the treatment of anxiety and depression in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The search spanned from the establishment of the database until September 1, 2023. Revman 5.4 and Stata 15.0 software were used for network meta-analysis (NMA), and the included interventions were ranked by the area under the cumulative ranking curve. RESULTS: A total of 26 articles involving 8 interventions were included. In terms of improving HAMA score, MOX was superior to EA, combined therapies, CH, WM and placebo; In terms of improving HAMD score, MOX was superior to ACU, EA, combined therapies, WM and placebo; In terms of improving the SAS score, The combined therapies were superior to EA, CH and WM; In terms of improving SDS scores, The combined therapies were superior to EA, CH and WM; In terms of improving IBS-SSS score, The combined therapies were superior to WM; In terms of reducing recurrence rates, CH was superior to combined therapies; In terms of improving total effective rates, MOX was superior to EA, CH, WM and placebo; MOX, combined therapies, ACU and EA ranked higher in SUCRA of different outcome indicators. CONCLUSION: MOX, combined therapies, ACU and EA have certain curative effect on anxiety and depression in patients with IBS-D, and their safety is high. ACU and MOX combined with other therapies also have significant advantages in the treatment effect.


Subject(s)
Acupuncture Therapy , Anxiety , Depression , Irritable Bowel Syndrome , Moxibustion , Network Meta-Analysis , Humans , Moxibustion/methods , Acupuncture Therapy/methods , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/therapy , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/psychology , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/complications , Anxiety/therapy , Anxiety/etiology , Depression/therapy , Depression/etiology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome
8.
Nutrients ; 16(6)2024 Mar 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38542689

ABSTRACT

The complex role of the gut microbiome in the pathogenesis of gastrointestinal (GI) disorders is an emerging area of research, and there is considerable interest in understanding how diet can alter the composition and function of the microbiome. Prebiotics and probiotics have been shown to beneficially modulate the gut microbiome, which underlies their potential for benefit in GI conditions. Formulating specific recommendations for the public regarding these dietary supplements has been difficult due to the significant heterogeneity between strains, doses, and duration of treatment investigated across studies, as well as safety concerns with administering live organisms. This review aims to summarize the existing evidence for the use of prebiotics and probiotics in various GI disorders, paying special attention to strain-specific effects that emerged and any adverse effects noted.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Diseases , Irritable Bowel Syndrome , Probiotics , Humans , Prebiotics , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/therapy , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Dietary Supplements , Gastrointestinal Diseases/therapy
9.
Ital J Pediatr ; 50(1): 51, 2024 Mar 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38486305

ABSTRACT

The irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional gastrointestinal disorder (FGID), whose prevalence has widely increased in pediatric population during the past two decades. The exact pathophysiological mechanism underlying IBS is still uncertain, thus resulting in challenging diagnosis and management. Experts from 4 Italian Societies participated in a Delphi consensus, searching medical literature and voting process on 22 statements on both diagnosis and management of IBS in children. Recommendations and levels of evidence were evaluated according to the grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Consensus was reached for all statements. These guidelines suggest a positive diagnostic strategy within a symptom-based approach, comprehensive of psychological comorbidities assessment, alarm signs and symptoms' exclusion, testing for celiac disease and, under specific circumstances, fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein. Consensus also suggests to rule out constipation in case of therapeutic failure. Conversely, routine stool testing for enteric pathogens, testing for food allergy/intolerance or small intestinal bacterial overgrowth are not recommended. Colonoscopy is recommended only in patients with alarm features. Regarding treatment, the consensus strongly suggests a dietary approach, psychologically directed therapies and, in specific conditions, gut-brain neuromodulators, under specialist supervision. Conditional recommendation was provided for both probiotics and specific fibers supplementation. Polyethylene glycol achieved consensus recommendation for specific subtypes of IBS. Secretagogues and 5-HT4 agonists are not recommended in children with IBS-C. Certain complementary alternative therapies, antispasmodics and, in specific IBS subtypes, loperamide and rifaximin could be considered.


Subject(s)
Gastroenterology , Irritable Bowel Syndrome , Humans , Child , Adolescent , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diagnosis , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/therapy , Consensus , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Italy
10.
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu ; 44(3): 283-294, 2024 Mar 12.
Article in English, Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38467503

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To observe the effects of moxibustion on colonic mast cell degranulation and inflammatory factor expression in rats with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D), and explore the potential mechanism of moxibustion in treating IBS-D. METHODS: Forty-five rat pups born from 5 healthy SPF-grade pregnant SD rats, with 8 rats were randomly selected as the normal group. The remaining 37 rats were intervened with maternal separation, acetic acid enema, and chronic restraint stress to establish the IBS-D model. The successfully modeled 32 rats were then randomly assigned to a model group, a ketotifen group, a moxibustion group, and a moxibustion-medication group, with 8 rats in each group. The rats in the ketotifen group were intervened with intragastric administration of ketotifen solution (10 mL/kg); the rats in the moxibustion group were intervened with suspended moxibustion on bilateral "Tianshu" (ST 25) and "Shangjuxu" (ST 37); the rats in the moxibustion-medication group were intervened with suspended moxibustion combined with intragastric administration of ketotifen solution. All interventions were administered once daily for 7 consecutive days. The diarrhea rate and minimum volume threshold of abdominal withdrawal reflex (AWR) were calculated before and after modeling, as well as after intervention. After intervention, colonic tissue morphology was observed using HE staining; colonic mucosal ultrastructure was examined by scanning electron microscopy; colonic mast cell ultrastructure was observed using transmission electron microscopy; mast cell degranulation was assessed by toluidine blue staining; serum and colonic levels of histamine, interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-6, IL-1α, trypsin-like enzyme, and protease-activated receptor 2 (PAR-2) were measured by ELISA; the Western blot and real-time quantitative PCR were employed to evaluate the protein and mRNA expression of colonic IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-1α, trypsin-like enzyme, and PAR-2; the immunofluorescence was used to detect the positive expression of histamine, IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-1α, trypsin-like enzyme, and PAR-2 in the colonic tissue. RESULTS: Compared to the normal group, the rats in the model group exhibited extensive infiltration of inflammatory cells in colonic tissue, severe damage to the colonic mucosa, disordered arrangement of villi, reduced electron density, and a significant decrease in granule quantity within mast cells. The diarrhea rate and mast cell degranulation rate were increased (P<0.01), AWR minimum volume threshold was decreased (P<0.01); the serum and colonic levels of histamine, IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-1α, trypsin-like enzyme, and PAR-2 were elevated (P<0.01); the positive expression of histamine, as well as protein, mRNA and positive expression of IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-1α, trypsin-like enzyme, and PAR-2 in the colon were all elevated (P<0.01). Compared to the model group, the rats in the ketotifen group, the moxibustion group, and the moxibustion-medication group exhibited significantly reduced infiltration of inflammatory cells in colonic tissue, relatively intact colonic mucosa, orderly arranged villi, increased electron density, and an augmented number of mast cell granules; the diarrhea rate and mast cell degranulation rate were decreased (P<0.01), and AWR minimum volume threshold was increased (P<0.01); the serum and colonic levels of histamine, IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-1α, trypsin-like enzyme, and PAR-2 were reduced (P<0.01); the positive expression of histamine, as well as protein, mRNA and positive expression of IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-1α, trypsin-like enzyme, and PAR-2 in the colon were all decreased (P<0.01). Compared to the ketotifen group, the moxibustion group showed decreased serum levels of histamine, IL-6, and trypsin-like enzyme (P<0.01, P<0.05), as well as reduced colonic levels of IL-1ß and IL-6 (P<0.01, P<0.05); the protein expression of colonic IL-1ß, IL-1α, and PAR-2 was reduced (P<0.05), and the positive expression of colonic IL-1ß and trypsin-like enzyme was reduced (P<0.01, P<0.05). Compared to both the ketotifen group and the moxibustion group, the moxibustion-medication group exhibited decreased diarrhea rate and mast cell degranulation rate (P<0.01), an increased AWR minimum volume threshold (P<0.01), reduced serum and colonic levels of histamine, IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-1α, trypsin-like enzyme, and PAR-2 (P<0.01), decreased protein expression of colonic IL-1ß, trypsin-like enzyme, and PAR-2 (P<0.01, P<0.05), reduced mRNA and positive expression of colonic IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-1α, trypsin-like enzyme, and PAR-2 (P<0.01, P<0.05), and decreased positive expression of colonic histamine (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Moxibustion on "Tianshu" (ST 25) and "Shangjuxu" (ST 37) might inhibit low-grade inflammatory reactions in the colon of IBS-D model rats. The mechanism may be related to the inhibition of histamine and trypsin-like enzyme secreted by mast cell, thereby reducing the expression of related inflammatory factors.


Subject(s)
Irritable Bowel Syndrome , Moxibustion , Rats , Animals , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/genetics , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/therapy , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Mast Cells/metabolism , Trypsin , Cell Degranulation , Histamine , Interleukin-6 , Ketotifen , Maternal Deprivation , Diarrhea/etiology , Diarrhea/therapy , RNA, Messenger
11.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr ; 149(7): 369-373, 2024 Mar.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38479421

ABSTRACT

Acute abdominal pain may relate to specific organ systems and needs an interdisciplinary approach with close collaboration between internal and surgical disciplines. Main objective is to shorten the diagnostic work-up between the beginning of the symptoms and their therapy. After clarifying of the five w-questions: when, how, how long, why, and where, abdominal ultrasound, ECG, laboratory diagnostics and early application of computed tomography should be performed.For the most part, chronic abdominal pain is caused by disorders of the gut-brain-axis such as the irritable bowel syndrome. Because of the synaptic plasticity, the processing of pain is dynamic and cannot be related to a single organ system. This problem is obvious in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and colonic diverticula, which may be interpreted as symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD, type 3a). However, a reliable clinical differentiation between both groups is not possible. The establishment of SUDD (type 3a) considerable widened the application area of mesalazine.


Subject(s)
Diverticular Diseases , Diverticulosis, Colonic , Irritable Bowel Syndrome , Humans , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diagnosis , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/therapy , Diverticular Diseases/diagnosis , Diverticular Diseases/therapy , Diverticular Diseases/complications , Diverticulosis, Colonic/complications , Diverticulosis, Colonic/diagnosis , Diverticulosis, Colonic/therapy , Mesalamine/therapeutic use , Abdominal Pain/diagnosis , Abdominal Pain/etiology
12.
Gastroenterology ; 166(4): 572-587.e1, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38309628

ABSTRACT

Disorders of gut-brain interaction are characterized by chronic gastrointestinal symptoms in the absence of abnormal endoscopic or radiologic findings or objective biomarkers that can be identified during routine clinical evaluation. The assessment of the symptom pattern and severity, therefore, is the key modality to evaluate the presence, impact, and evolution of these conditions, for both clinical and regulatory purposes. Patient-reported outcomes are structured symptom assessment questionnaires designed to evaluate symptom patterns, quantify severity of symptoms, and evaluate response to treatment at follow-up. This review provides an overview of currently available patient-reported outcomes for evaluating the main disorders of gut-brain interaction, specifically, functional dyspepsia; irritable bowel syndrome; and chronic constipation. It summarizes their content, level of validation for clinical practice and for research, and the regulatory approach to these conditions. Expected future developments and need for further research on patient-reported outcomes for these and other disorders of gut-brain interaction are highlighted.


Subject(s)
Dyspepsia , Gastrointestinal Diseases , Irritable Bowel Syndrome , Humans , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diagnosis , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/therapy , Gastrointestinal Diseases/diagnosis , Gastrointestinal Diseases/therapy , Constipation , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Patient Reported Outcome Measures
13.
Curr Gastroenterol Rep ; 26(4): 107-114, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38353900

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) is a clinical disorder that may explain irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) type symptoms as well as other allergic symptoms experienced by an individual. The diagnosis and treatment of MCAS with specific focus on gastrointestinal (GI) manifestations is reviewed. RECENT FINDINGS: Although biomarkers for MCAS remain elusive, testing for baseline serum tryptase will distinguish the type of mast cell disorder and urine tests for mast cell mediator metabolites may support the diagnosis. Endoscopy and Colonoscopy with biopsies is not used to diagnose MCAS but is important to rule out other conditions that may cause symptoms. There is increased awareness of the association between MCAS and autonomic dysfunction, small fiber neuropathy, and connective tissue disorders which all impact GI symptoms. MCAS is a disorder often of unknown etiology (idiopathic) and characterized by intermittent allergy type symptoms that affect multiple organ systems after exposure to a trigger. GI symptoms including abdominal cramping and loose stool are prominent and mimic those of IBS. Diagnostic testing is performed to assess for elevations in mast cell mediators during symptoms and to rule out other conditions. A comprehensive treatment plan includes medications that target mast cells, treatments for associated conditions including autonomic dysfunction, and management of comorbid psychiatric illness and nutritional deficits.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Diseases , Irritable Bowel Syndrome , Mast Cell Activation Syndrome , Mastocytosis , Humans , Mastocytosis/complications , Mastocytosis/diagnosis , Mastocytosis/therapy , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/complications , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diagnosis , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/therapy , Mast Cells/pathology , Gastrointestinal Diseases/diagnosis , Gastrointestinal Diseases/etiology , Gastrointestinal Diseases/therapy
14.
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis ; 33(1): 107-114, 2024 Mar 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38386892

ABSTRACT

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) lacks a clear understanding of the disease's pathogenesis and effective treatments thus producing frustration among providers and patients, leading to the stigmatization of the disease and the patients with the syndrome. A literature search was performed to make a hermeneutical review on empathic patient-provider communication and IBS. The relationship is defined by partners being dependent on one another in the pursuit of obtaining good outcomes. It is a unique interaction depending not only on the individual qualities of each partner but also on the specific patterns of the patient-physician synergy. Empathy is crucial for any relationship. It helps to recognize the other as the other of myself, a person like me. Meanwhile, stigmatization results from identifying and labelling human differences and stereotyping persons who are linked to undesirable characteristics. IBS is at high risk of stigmatization in various contexts and settings including health care, causing patients and physicians misconceptions and distress, which in turn leads to the worsening of the disease in patients and burnout in physicians. Narrative-based medicine helps create a holistic perspective of a patient's problems and health, thus providing a tool for an empathic doctor-patient relationship that fosters mutual understanding and helps patients with IBS make sense of symptoms, increases their ability to manage their IBS in a psychologically flexible manner, subsequently helping them maintain their quality of life.


Subject(s)
Irritable Bowel Syndrome , Physicians , Humans , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diagnosis , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/therapy , Physician-Patient Relations , Quality of Life , Empathy
15.
Neurobiol Dis ; 193: 106440, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38369213

ABSTRACT

Limited treatment options have been shown to alter the natural course of constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-C). Therefore, safer and more effective approaches are urgently needed. We investigated the effects of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) in a mouse model of IBS-C. In the current study, C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into normal control, IBS-C model control, sham-electrostimulation (sham-ES), taVNS, and drug treatment groups. The effects of taVNS on fecal pellet number, fecal water content, and gastrointestinal transit were evaluated in IBS-C model mice. We assessed the effect of taVNS on visceral hypersensitivity using the colorectal distention test. 16S rRNA sequencing was used to analyze the fecal microbiota of the experimental groups. First, we found that taVNS increased fecal pellet number, fecal water content, and gastrointestinal transit in IBS-C model mice compared with the sham-ES group. Second, taVNS significantly decreased the abdominal withdrawal reflex (AWR) score compared with the sham-ES group, thus relieving visceral hyperalgesia. Third, the gut microbiota outcomes showed that taVNS restored Lactobacillus abundance while increasing Bifidobacterium probiotic abundance at the genus level. Notably, taVNS increased the number of c-kit-positive interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) in the myenteric plexus region in IBS-C mice compared with the sham-ES group. Therefore, our study indicated that taVNS effectively ameliorated IBS-C in the gut microbiota and ICC.


Subject(s)
Irritable Bowel Syndrome , Vagus Nerve Stimulation , Mice , Animals , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/therapy , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/microbiology , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Disease Models, Animal , Constipation/etiology , Constipation/therapy , Water , Vagus Nerve
16.
Complement Ther Clin Pract ; 55: 101841, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38387324

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hypnotherapy continues to be a controversial practice in medicine. It is surrounded by myth and misuses that instill doubts about its legitimacy and usefulness. PURPOSE: In this paper, we will distinguish pseudoscientific claims from evidence-based uses of hypnotherapy. RESULTS: The use and acceptability of hypnotherapy has varied over history. Pseudoscientific uses, based on outdated theories that it can access the unconscious mind, have delegitimized hypnotherapy. Modern theories that hypnosis uses common social, emotional, and cognitive processes combined with evidence-based methods have re-established the use of hypnotherapy in many physical and mental health disorders and symptoms. Currently it is a widely accepted and recommended treatment for irritable bowel syndrome, with evidence building for many other applications. CONCLUSION: Hypnotherapy, as a pseudoscience, can become unethical and cause distress for the patient and their families. Hypnotherapy, as an evidence-based treatment, can be used as a powerful tool to treat physical and psychological symptoms related to medical ailments.


Subject(s)
Hypnosis , Irritable Bowel Syndrome , Mental Disorders , Humans , Pseudoscience , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/therapy , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diagnosis , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/psychology , Emotions
17.
Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed) ; 71(1): 19-30, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38331656

ABSTRACT

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a gastrointestinal functional disorder mainly characterised by abdominal pain, bloating and altered bowel habits. Dysbiosis might seem to be involved in the pathogenesis of the disease. Probiotics represent a potential treatment, since these could favour the functional microbiota and improve symptoms. The aim was to review the effectiveness of the use of probiotics in IBS symptomatology, analysing the influence of duration and dose. 18 articles were included. At the individual level, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium and Bacillus could be useful in the treatment of symptoms. Bifidobacterium bifidum reported the best results (1 × 109 CFU/day for 4 weeks). The most effective combination was 2 Lactobacillus strains, one of Bifidobacterium and one of Streptococcus (4 × 109 CFU/day for 4 weeks). Future clinical trials should confirm these results and analyse the difference between individual and combined treatments.


Subject(s)
Irritable Bowel Syndrome , Probiotics , Humans , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/therapy , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Lactobacillus , Bifidobacterium , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Abdominal Pain/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...